I didn't mind it when you could actually move shit around on your page, before your page was a feed like timelines are now... You could star a post to make it bigger, you had better control over dates to move posts around... you could actually do limited customization. Now, the only power you really have is to delete stuff, which is what I'm forced to do when I want to move stuff around.
Yeah, except it doesn't matter zero percent what someone posts on their FB page the other side of the equation is a mess of viewed data that is constantly inaccurate to the person's own posted material and just profits off everyone similar to black slavery. It would seem your beautiful page layout is a work of many hours and a masterpiece to yourself, on the other user feeds it just turns into crazy psychological interrogation that everyone could read on each one another. This was the problem with the website from the very start and it was never altered to increase the user freedoms over what is exactly seen.
C Facebook is an ad revenue generating site that allows you to use their site to 'connect' with people at the cost of having all information input into their system redistributed to companies with the intention of generating revenue and profit. Privacy on the site is limited to what you agreed to in the beginning. As their T&A states, everything is subject to change without notice, and the company is not to be held liable for what happens when changes are implemented
Yeah realistically facebook should be user based in agreeance to how everything is functional and stated in the leger, although I know for a fact that dozens of felonies and other illegal activity takes place every second using their juxtaposition of feeds and other nonsense against all legal framework. So why are the users punished for what is obviously a major design flaw that is built and created by the few that programmed the site itself. I call bs on the facebook world itself, if the transparent data was released in all the harm they have done to the world most of them would be back where they started.
Users are punished for abusing it, like a law or loophole. Just because it's there doesn't mean you can/should do it. At which point the responsibility falls on the user to maintain the agreement that said user would abide by the T&A. If T&A states that users word be punished for taking advantage of a bug instead of reporting the bug, then the user would be at fault for not adhering to the guidelines set in place. Poorly programmed or not, agreeing and making a binding contract with the company/site means you agreed that all things were in order and you would abide by their rules. None of which rules out how bad Facebook is now.
Yes and no really, Example: If Facebook is found to be the cause of say 10 murders or 10 deaths per day due to locational data trends being modified and all other information is syncing with the users in order to finalize the deaths of these many victimized people how is that legally in the Terms and Agreements that your data could be shared with many many others that cause it to become a legal loophole. I am just suggestively stating that if laws apply to all citizens of north america and facebook itself is programmed by humans, does that not dictate that all the programmers working on this system are unconvicted felons with lifetimes of jail time. It's really a double standard and when you apply all laws against what I just said, it shows the true nature of certain social media sites are based upon an advanced level of corruption that infact on the singular user base if lawsuits were filed would completely bankrupt the entire website.
We removed the bass due to hearing issues that were taking place, and replaced it with this more party friendly lava lamp