The religious perspective. Wanna have this discussion?

Discussion in 'Politics and Debate' started by mcpon14, Jan 19, 2018.

  1. .:Batman:.

    .:Batman:. Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    [​IMG]
    This is the only Jesus I worship
     
  2. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    That ***** owes me 12 bucks.
     
  3. .:Batman:.

    .:Batman:. Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    He got game
     
  4. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Ray Allen can't act. :(
     
  5. .:Batman:.

    .:Batman:. Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    He can ball tho :blush:
     
  6. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Especially shooting threes. :rolleyes2:
     
    • Love Love x 1
  7. .:Batman:.

    .:Batman:. Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Deadeye corner specialist
     
  8. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    With a nice butt. :drool:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. TheThirdAngel144

    TheThirdAngel144 Newbie

    Blogs:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2018
    Posts:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you saying that they wrote something which was historically inaccurate, even if they didn't know it was? I would say, that's a dangerous idea to hold.
     
  10. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Yes, because their intention was to deliver to people some "good news." It would be the equivalent of someone telling a group of people that there are free tacos at a certain taco stand, except in this case, the fact of it could be verified.
     
  11. 867k

    867k Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    But you have you believe really really hard, and only when you die are allowed to eat. :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  12. 867k

    867k Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    If I can't hold those promised tacos in my hand, or salivate over their smell, I would say there are no tacos. And I would try to persuade others of the fact there are no tacos, and that we should go on a quest for real, unadultered knowledge backed by scientific evidence.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Then that would be subscribing to the scientific method of thinking and perspective, which is perfectly well and good.
     
  14. 867k

    867k Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    As oppose to..?
     
  15. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    What this thread is about. :)
     
  16. 867k

    867k Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Sorry I didn't read all of it.
    Can you explain to me in laymen's terms?
    :)
     
  17. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    The religious perspective, and method of thinking and reasoning. :)
     
  18. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    The source of evidence is a key religious text or authority figure.
    And your premises are verses or sections of the text or the actions or sayings of the religious figure, and you arrive at conclusions using those premises as to what the sect's doctrines and beliefs are.
     
  19. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    Both beliefs are based on faith.
    Empirical reasoning is based on faith that your senses are not deceiving you.
    Religious reasoning is based on faith that your religious authority (texts, figures, etc.) are not deceiving you.
     
  20. mcpon14

    mcpon14 Guest

    Blogs:
    0
    And a lot of scientific claims that people believe in are just trusting that your sources are not lying to you, unless you look at the evidence yourself and test them yourself. :)
     

Share This Page