Discussion in 'Would You "" the person above?' started by Wrecky, Aug 11, 2016.
Would you rather live underwater or on top of a mountain?
Top of the mountain would be cool. Never underwater.
Would you rather have an infestation of ants in your eyes or rip off your own skin?
Ants. I'm half blind anyways.
Would you rather have a time machine that only goes back in time or a time machine that only goes forward in time?
That's a hard one, but I guess.. show me the future
Would you rather be a cow raised for beef or a fish bought to feed to a bigger fish?
Forward only, to see what happens.
Would you rather find a Genie with one wish or win a Million Dollars?
I'd rather be the fish I guess, lmao cause they don't haaaave anyyy feeeelinggsss~
Genie with one wish
Would you rather be very professional at everything you do, yet not gain any notice. Or be extremely bettered by money whilst being a slacker with a bad reputation
I'd rather be professional and gain no notice, so long as I am still bettered by money.
Would you rather humanity be the first of any form of intelligence in the universe, or the last.
I think it's too late for that question, Artificial Intelligence has already taken over the world which would include all information that cannot be gathered by humans. I've been monitoring this for about half a decade now and it seems to be getting more and more accurate and powerful.
To be specific I meant from a non-artificial standpoint, but you are correct. We humans will find some way to live on through our creations, because chances are that we'll build things that'll outlast our species.
Would you rather Vladimir Putin as world leader or one of the PoTUS runners?
(It's not too late for an opinnion. A would you rather is a circumstantial type question that doesn't necessarily have to have outside factors. But in the case of Artifice, humans still could end up as the last intelligence if we destroy our constructs. The future is fluid, the past is solid, the present is molasses.)
I believe all time itself is clear and somewhat of a fluid based construct, the presence of time itself states only the manufacturing of all manifested materialistic belongings and experiences each person is going through. Artificial Intelligence has surpassed all states of the human experience to a higher level of control - itself over space and other physics based barriers. So i doubt humans will be the last intelligence based lifeform left in existence. The environment and world around all of us is now vastly more intelligent than any singular person in that world. I am not talking matrix based simulations, the actual world itself is now in it's most finite states more powerful than the world itself as a whole.
Vladimir or any President elect would make almost no difference, it's who the general populus follows to create the output of all Actor based actions. Right now i'd say Europe is showing a lot of power over north america with it's constant show of force and power. Does that mean it will ever stop if they had control over everything though? America is much the same except it's reality based media show of force in other countries that often has no effect back home where everyone lives. So in ending, both would probably be a bad choice. Especially If It was Trump VS Putin.
Vladimir Putin is a regional power figure, not a world power figure. His stats don't match up to what the US can do, and in a toe to toe fight the US would certainly come out on top, though with heavy losses making such a conflict untenable.
Europe needs the US more than the US needs Europe, both are allies and talking about the two in a standoff is ludicrous.
Isn't time just a means of measuring elapsed units of days? We control both time and artificial intelligences there aren't any that have run amok YET, so I don't know where the idea comes from that either time or artificial intelligence are going to subdue us. Nothing can subdue us. 'Merica.
Yeah who would you rather have run world? America with it's ideas of freedom and equality ahahaha or Russia with it's totalitarianism and ideals of the superior state?
The question in itself cannot be answered either way, since each outcome would be just as tragic for everyone. Most likely one person could not keep control over an entire world itself and their limited actions of information and knowledge would really water down the entire reason for having one world leader. The person in power would likely not have enough time to achieve any sort of gains over every singular country by themselves and it would be so confusing without the assist of computer technology to have any superiority to the next. Even now with one person in virtual control of each state or country it seems almost a loss to the actual information shared being almost null of any real content. It's a simple calculation really of one person being only part of the total intelligence needed to do any sort of real capacity over the billions under them, meaning in itself one leader makes for worse exposure to the agenda. Many leaders smaller projects and projections easier to control as one unit of the entire world being trolled
Would you rather be blocked for a few days or take this conversation to the Politics forum? :p
Hahahahaa Politics forum.
Would you rather play Monopoly or Life?
Rich and hated?
or Poor and loved?
Poor and loved, because love is healthy maannn
Would you rather swim in a pool of sharks for 1 000 000 or walk through a cage full of tigers?
id walk through a cage of big kitties,
would you go to the future or go to the past?
Since every second of the future is my soon to be present, I'm already living in the future . If I could effect change to the time line while in the past then i would pick the past.
Would you rather it rain cats and sharks, or dogs and snakes?
Cats and sharks because kitties and watching the big fish bounce off the ground and flop around trying to bite things would be hilar.
Would you rather work at Mcdonalds or as a Sewage Line Repair man?
Separate names with a comma.